United States Eighth Circuit

Summary judgment for an insurer on a claim for benefits under an automobile insurance policy issued to plaintiffs arising out of a car accident is affirmed where the district court did not err in its choice-of-law analysis, and properly concluded that the plain language of a policy barred recovery of uninsured motorist benefits, consistent with Canadian law.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/21/2006
• Published 07/21/2006

Judges

• BOWMAN, Circuit Judge., Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• James F. Dunn, argued, Eagan, MN, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Katherine A. McBride, argued, Minneapolis, MN, for appellee.