United States Eighth Circuit
Rottlund Co. v. Pinnacle Corp., 05-1296, 05-1398, 05-1501
Denial of a production home builder's motion for a new trial following a jury verdict adverse to its copyright infringement claim is reversed pursuant to plaintiff's claim that the district court erred in admitting certain expert testimony.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/20/2006
- Published 06/20/2006
Judges
- WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Thomas H. Boyd, argued, Minneapolis, MN (Robert R. Weinstine, Craig S. Krummen, Philip R. Mahowald and David A. Davenport of Minneapolis, on the brief), for appellant, Holly J. Newman and Benjamin Patrick, Minneapolis, MN, for Bloodgood.
- For Appellees:
- Christopher J. Murdoch of Chicago, IL (Matthew I. Farmer Chicago, IL, Land Darren B. Schwiebert, Minneapolis, MN, on the brief), for appellee Pinnacle Corporation d/b/a Town & Country Homes.