United States Eighth Circuit

In an action arising from contracts for the sale and service of certain pollution control devices, a judgment for defendant-corporation on plaintiff's claims for tortious interference and prima facie tort, and a refusal to pierce the corporate veil of defendant's subsidiaries are affirmed where plaintiff failed to establish sufficient evidence as to the claims.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/16/2006
• Published 06/16/2006

Judges

• JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge., Before ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Peter E. Strand, argued, Washington, DC (Manual Lopez, Houston, TX, and Carlos Porvencio and Christine Hudson, Washington, DC, on the brief), for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Cathy J. Dean, argued, Kansas City, MO (Jason Stuart Dalen and R. Chace Ramey, on the brief), for appellee.