United States Eighth Circuit
US v. White Plume, 05-1654
In a case involving marijuana or hemp cultivation by a member of an Indian tribe, summary judgment in favor of the government is affirmed over claims that the district court erred: 1) by holding that industrial hemp was subject to the Controlled Substances Act (CSA); 2) by finding that the Treaty of Fort Laramie did not grant a tribe the right to cultivate hemp; and 3) by failing to find that regulating hemp under the CSA constitutes a due process and equal protection violation.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/17/2006
- Published 05/17/2006
Judges
- BEAM, Circuit Judge., Before BYE, BEAM, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Bruce H. Ellison, argued, Rapid City, SD, for appellant White Plume., David C. Frankel, argued, San Francisco, CA, for Tierra Madre.
- For Appellees:
- Mark E. Salter, argued, Asst U.S. Attorney, Sioux Falls, SD, for appellee.