United States Eighth Circuit

Dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction of an action alleging violations of the Lanham Act and related claims involving royalties for certain psychological tests is affirmed where plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction, general jurisdiction did not exist over defendant, and there was no abuse of discretion in denial of a motion to supplement the record.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/11/2006
• Published 04/11/2006

Judges

• WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, LAY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Paul Eston Lacy, argued, Stillwater, MN, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Charles N. Nauen, argued, Minneapolis, MN (William A. Gengler, Minneapolis, MN and Garet S. Aden, Nashville, TN, on the brief), for appellee.