United States Eighth Circuit

Summary judgment to defendant-employer in a suit alleging sex discrimination in violation of Title VII arising from a supervisor's use of a bathroom peephole is affirmed where the district court did not err in dismissing disparate treatment claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and plaintiffs failed to establish their prima facie claims of hostile work environment.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/07/2006
• Published 04/07/2006

Judges

• GRUENDER, Circuit Judge., Before MURPHY, BOWMAN and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• James A. Montee, argued, St. Joseph, MO (Susan K. Montee, St. Joseph, MO, on the brief), for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Erin E. Packel, argued, Kansas City, MO (John J. Yates and Kara M. Dorssom, Kansas City, on the brief), for appellee.