United States Eighth Circuit

A final forfeiture order of claimant's husband's seized property is affirmed where claimant lacked the requisite ownership interest under Missouri law for her and her husband to have held a tenancy by the entirety in the forfeited property, and her Eighth Amendment claim that the forfeiture constituted an excessive fine failed for lack of standing.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/22/2006
• Published 03/22/2006

Judges

• PER CURIAM., Before WOLLMAN and RILEY, Circuit Judges, and ROSENBAUM, District Judge.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Will Bunch, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• James C. Delworth, Asst. U.S. Attorney, St. Louis, MO, for appellee.