United States Eighth Circuit
US v. Hively, 04-3349, 04-3352
Defendants' convictions for mail fraud and racketeering are affirmed over claims regarding: 1) insufficiency of the evidence, 2) absence of an evidentiary hearing on a claim of double jeopardy, 3) a forfeiture order, 4) error in rejoining a defendant's case to those of other defendants, and 5) the excusing of a juror.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/10/2006
- Published 02/10/2006
Judges
- MURPHY, Circuit Judge., Before ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Timothy O. Dudley, argued, Little Rock, AR, for appellant Hively., Dennis Owens, argued, Kansas City, MO, for appellant Ketz.
- For Appellees:
- Todd L Newton, argued, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Little Rock, AR (Angela S. Jegley, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Little Rock, AR, on the brief), for appellee.