United States Eighth Circuit

Dismissal of a suit asserting claims under the Lanham Act, the Minnesota Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and additional claims involving the publishing of certain psychological tests is affirmed where the district court did not err in dismissing the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/03/2006
• Published 02/03/2006

Judges

• WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, LAY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Paul Eston Lacy, argued, Stillwater, MN, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Charles N. Nauen, argued, Minneapolis, MN (William A. Gengler, Minneapolis, MN and Garet S. Aden, Nashville, TN, on the brief), for appellee.