United States Eighth Circuit

Summary judgment for a municipality in a challenge to a zoning regulation is affirmed where an ordinance restricting a firearms retailer from relocating his dealership did not violate equal protection or due process, no substantive due process violation was shown, and a Takings Clause claim was not ripe for review.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/25/2006
• Published 01/25/2006

Judges

• BYE, Circuit Judge., Before BYE, BEAM, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Randall D.B. Tigue, argued, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• CBurt T. Osborne, argued, Minneapolis, MN, for appellee.