United States Eighth Circuit

In a case regarding a plaintiff's claim for insurance coverage for loss resulting from an alleged property theft, the district court erred in finding the insurance policy provision excluding conversion or embezzlement ambiguous; the theft was actually conversion, and excluded from coverage.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/01/2005
• Published 11/01/2005

Judges

• HEANEY, Circuit Judge., Before MURPHY, HEANEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Counsel who represented the appellant were Henry M. Helgen and Amanda R. Cefalu, Minneapolis, MN.


• For Appellees:
  
• Counsel who represented the appellee was Patrick M. Ginsbach, Hot Springs, Arkansas.