United States Eighth Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

Harley v. Agostini, 03-3654

In a class action alleging that defendant-employer breached its fiduciary duties under ERISA, plaintiffs failed to present the kind of clear and convincing evidence of misrepresentation required to prevail on a Rule 60(b)(3) motion to vacate a judgment.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/28/2005
  • Published 06/28/2005


  • JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, JOHN R. GIBSON, and BYE, Circuit Judges.


  • United States Eighth Circuit


  • For Appellant:
  • Alan M. Sandals, argued, Philadelphia, PA (Jonathan S. Levy, Philadelphia, Seymore J. Mansfield and Debra S. Nelson, Minneapolis, MN, on the brief), for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Steven L. Severenson, argued, Minneapolis, MN (John D. French, Deborah A. Ellingboe, Minneapolis, J. Alan Gailbraith, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellee.