Harley v. Agostini, 03-3654
In a class action alleging that defendant-employer breached its fiduciary duties under ERISA, plaintiffs failed to present the kind of clear and convincing evidence of misrepresentation required to prevail on a Rule 60(b)(3) motion to vacate a judgment.
- Decided 06/28/2005
- Published 06/28/2005
- JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, JOHN R. GIBSON, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
- United States Eighth Circuit
- For Appellant:
- Alan M. Sandals, argued, Philadelphia, PA (Jonathan S. Levy, Philadelphia, Seymore J. Mansfield and Debra S. Nelson, Minneapolis, MN, on the brief), for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Steven L. Severenson, argued, Minneapolis, MN (John D. French, Deborah A. Ellingboe, Minneapolis, J. Alan Gailbraith, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellee.