United States Eighth Circuit

Defendant's robbery conviction is affirmed over his claims that the district court erred by 1)denying his motion to suppress DNA evidence 2)admitting evidence of a prior armed robbery, and 3)denying his motion for a new trial based on the government's failure to disclose evidence.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/11/2005
• Published 02/11/2005

Judges

• MURPHY, Circuit Judge., Before MURPHY, HANSEN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• William R. Woodford, argued, Minneapolis, MN (R.J. Zayed, Minneapolis, on the brief), for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Robert M. Lewis, argued, AUSA, Minneapolis, MN, for appellee.