Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


US v. LITTLE DOG, 04-1834

Defendant's convictions for sexual abuse are affirmed over his claim that the district court committed reversible errors in 1) denying his motion for judgment of acquittal based on insufficient evidence, and 2) denying his motion to sever his obstruction of justice count from his sexual abuse counts.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/25/2005
  • Published 01/25/2005

Judges

  • SMITH, Circuit Judge., Before SMITH, BEAM, and BENTON Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Reed A. Rasmussen, argued, Aberdeen, SD, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Mikal G. Hansen, Assistant U.S. Atty., argued, Pierre, SD, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard