United States Eighth Circuit

In a suit to determine whether plaintiff-insurance agent was required to repay his commission for cancelled policies, summary judgment for defendant-insurance company is reversed where plaintiff's employment contract was ambiguous and extrinsic evidence in the record does not determine the parties' intent.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/07/2004
• Published 10/07/2004

Judges

• RILEY, Circuit Judge., Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Counsel who represented the appellant were Robert O. Jester and W. Edward Coen, Jr. of Kansas City, MO.


• For Appellees:
  
• Counsel who represented the appellee were William R. Bay, Matthew S. Darrough, and Suzanne L. Montgomery of St. Louis, MO.