United States Eighth Circuit
US v. HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, 03-2251
Considering the lapse in time, change in location and change in interrogating personnel between defendant's unwarned questioning and the statement he made after receiving the Miranda warnings, the statement was admissible.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/29/2004
- Published 09/29/2004
Judges
- FAGG, Circuit Judge., Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Timothy J. Langley, argued, Sioux Falls, SD, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Michael E. Ridgway, Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Sioux Falls, SD (John J. Ulrich and Judith K. Grunewaldt, on the brief), for appellee.