United States Eighth Circuit

The district court misread plaintiffs' complaint and dismissed the case prematurely where plaintiff properly alleged that the bridging provisions in the defendant's pension plan were adopted in a discriminatory manner resulting in a present violation of Title VII.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/07/2004
• Published 09/07/2004

Judges

• HEANEY, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, HEANEY, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellants was Daniel W. Schermer of Minneapolis, MN. Also appearing on appellants' brief was Judith K. Schermer of Minneapolis, MN.


• For Appellees:
  
• Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Steven W. Wilson of Minneapolis, MN.