United States Eighth Circuit

There was sufficient evidence for a jury to find that plaintiff was discriminated against on the basis of her gender. The district court did not err in taking judicial notice of the size of defendant's workforce in applying the punitive damages cap set out in 42 U.S.C. section 1981a(b)(3).

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/30/2004
• Published 06/30/2004

Judges

• GOLDBERG, Judge., Before MURPHY and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG, Judge.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David J. Duddleston, argued, Minneapolis, MN (Natalie Wyatt-Brown and Mary L. Senkeil on the brief), for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Steve G. Heikens, argued, Minneapolis, MN, for appellee.