Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Eighth Circuit


US v. MARTIN, 03-2007

Statements cross-appellee gave to FBI agents were admissible in prosecution as the statements were voluntarily made because he was not in custody at the time he made the statements, and the agents' failure to read him his Miranda rights did not render the statements inadmissible.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/28/2004
  • Published 05/28/2004

Judges

  • MELLOY, Circuit Judge., Before MELLOY, FAGG and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Martin was Paul C. Engh, argued, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for appellant., Janice M. Symchych, argued, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Kimberly Fuhrman on the brief), for appellant/cross-appellant Biernat.

  • For Appellees:
  • Mark D. Larsen, argued, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Thomas B. Heffelfinger on the brief), appellee/cross-appellant.
Copied to clipboard