Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


CHONG v. PARKER, 03-2128

No evidence supported plaintiff's claim that defendant-bank played any part in its employee's misrepresentations concerning the history and condition of a used car he was selling, or that he was acting within the scope of his employment when he sold the car to plaintiff. Remanded for a trial on the issue of punitive damages, as there was sufficient evidence of outrageous conduct on defendant-employee's part to support submission to the jury under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/09/2004
  • Published 03/09/2004

Judges

  • MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Dale Irwin, argued, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Robert J.E. Edwards, argued, Kansas City, MO (David A. Goldberg, on the brief), for Appellee Wood & Huston Bank., Steven E. Marsh, argued, Springfield, MO (Christi D. Sewell, on the brief), for Appellees Roscoe and Rick A. Parker.
Copied to clipboard