United States Eighth Circuit
CHONG v. PARKER, 03-2128
No evidence supported plaintiff's claim that defendant-bank played any part in its employee's misrepresentations concerning the history and condition of a used car he was selling, or that he was acting within the scope of his employment when he sold the car to plaintiff. Remanded for a trial on the issue of punitive damages, as there was sufficient evidence of outrageous conduct on defendant-employee's part to support submission to the jury under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/09/2004
- Published 03/09/2004
Judges
- MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Dale Irwin, argued, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Robert J.E. Edwards, argued, Kansas City, MO (David A. Goldberg, on the brief), for Appellee Wood & Huston Bank., Steven E. Marsh, argued, Springfield, MO (Christi D. Sewell, on the brief), for Appellees Roscoe and Rick A. Parker.