United States Eighth Circuit
NAT'L CROP INS. v. FED. CROP INS., 02-3952
District court erred in determining it did not have jurisdiction to hear insurance companies' claim that defendant had improperly expanded coverage for farmers suffering sugar beet crop failure; insurers did not have to exhaust administrative remedies before the Board of Contract Appeals before bringing this action.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/05/2003
- Published 12/05/2003
Judges
- HEANEY, Circuit Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, and LAY and HEANEY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was P. John Owen of Overland Park, KS. Thomas H. Boyd of St. Paul, MN appeared on the brief.
- For Appellees:
- Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was E. Roy Hawkens, Justice Dept., Washington, D.C. Robert S. Greenspan, Justice Dept., Washington, D.C. appeared on the brief.