United States Eighth Circuit

There was ample evidence upon which a jury in a breach of contract action could find for an insurer on the basis of 1) plaintiff's unconditional cancellation of a policy, or 2) a determination that plaintiff's expectation of run-off coverage for risks that had attached during the term of the policy was not reasonable.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/09/2003
• Published 06/09/2003

Judges

• WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Dale O. Thornsjo, argued, Minneapolis, MN (Shamus P. O'Mears and Mark R. Azman, on the brief), for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Mark J. Feinberg, argued, Minneapolis, MN (Michael R. Cashman and Vickie L. Hilden, on the brief), for appellee.