United States Eighth Circuit
MEMS v. CITY OF ST. PAUL, 02-1834
Challenges to evidentiary rulings and instructions in a Title VII race harassment and hostile work environment case are rejected. District court properly applied the correct damages period for hostile work environment claims under Title VII and the Minnesota Human Rights Act.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/30/2003
- Published 04/30/2003
Judges
- MAGILL, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, HEANEY, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Jeffrey R. Anderson, argued, St. Paul, MN (Frances E. Baillon and Patrick W. Noaker, on the brief), for appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Peter G. Mikhail, argued, Assistant City Attorney, St. Paul, MN, for appellee.