Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Eighth Circuit


MEMS v. CITY OF ST. PAUL, 02-1834

Challenges to evidentiary rulings and instructions in a Title VII race harassment and hostile work environment case are rejected. District court properly applied the correct damages period for hostile work environment claims under Title VII and the Minnesota Human Rights Act.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/30/2003
  • Published 04/30/2003

Judges

  • MAGILL, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, HEANEY, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Jeffrey R. Anderson, argued, St. Paul, MN (Frances E. Baillon and Patrick W. Noaker, on the brief), for appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Peter G. Mikhail, argued, Assistant City Attorney, St. Paul, MN, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard