Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


US v. TWO EAGLE, 02-1487

Evidence was sufficient to support assault and firearm convictions, and a doctor's testimony about injuries was admissible even though it utilized the words of the legal standard in the applicable statute. Claim of grand jury misconduct rejected.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/04/2003
  • Published 02/04/2003

Judges

  • SMITH, Circuit Judge., Before MURPHY, JOHN R. GIBSON, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Edward G. Albright, argued, Pierre, SD (Robert Van Norman, on the brief), for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Randolph J. Seiler, argued, Pierre, SD (Jeannine Huber, on the brief), for appellee.
Copied to clipboard