United States Eighth Circuit
SAULSBERRY v. ST. MARY'S UNIV. OF MINNESOTA, 01-3991
Plaintiff failed to show he was similarly situated to white employees who received greater percentages of tuition remission, and the district court did not err in granting summary judgment on a retaliation claim where plaintiff failed to show a causal connection between any adverse action and his protected activity.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/31/2003
- Published 01/31/2003
Judges
- MCMILLIAN, Circuit Judge., Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Steve G. Heikens, argued, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Robert L. McCollum, argued, Minneapolis, MN (Teri E. Bentson, on the brief), for appellee.