United States Eighth Circuit

An agreement for supply of snack products was a valid contract and did not fail for lack of mutuality at inception or indefiniteness; defendant bore the obligation to identify products it wished to buy, so that plaintiff could apply the parties' agreed-upon formula to determine pricing.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/11/2002
• Published 07/11/2002

Judges

• BEAM, Circuit Judge., Before:  WOLLMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Madison S. Spach, Jr., argued, Newport Beach, CA (Douglas S. Carter and Kevin T. O'Connor, on the brief), for appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Alok Ahuja, argued, Kansas City, MO (Gary D. Justis and Carrie Josserand, on the brief), for appellee.