United States Eighth Circuit

Where discharged postal worker did not offer evidence that he engaged in a statutorily protected activity, an essential element of his retaliation claim, his employment discrimination claim under the Rehabilitation Act was properly rejected.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/04/2002
• Published 03/04/2002

Judges

• McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge., Before McMILLIAN, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• John E. Mack, argued, New London, MN, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Friedrich Anson Paul Siekert, argued, Minneapolis, MN (Barbara H. Frazier, on the brief), for appellee.