United States Eighth Circuit
HUGHES v. 3M RETIREE MEDICAL PLAN, 01-1970
Where a summary retirement plan description does not contain vesting language and unambiguously reserves to the plan provider the right to change retirement benefits, the provider may increase premiums for retired employees' medical benefits.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/28/2002
- Published 02/28/2002
Judges
- BATTEY, District Judge., BEFORE: WOLLMAN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and BATTEY, District Judge.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Matthew B. Newman, argued, Savage, MN (Daniel J. Boivin, Ronald I. Meshbesher, Seymour J. Mansfield, Richard J. Fuller, Denise Y. Tataryn, on the brief), for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- John D. French, argued, Minneapolis, MN (Daniel C. Gerhan, Paul W. Heiring, Tina L. Lorleberg, on the brief), for appellee.