United States Eighth Circuit

Although the defendant foreclosed upon the plaintiff's property, without testimony that the plaintiff was targeted for outrageous conduct, that outrageous conduct took place, or even that the defendant was the sole cause of the plaintiff's distress, the plaintiff could not recover on claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/28/2002
• Published 02/28/2002

Judges

• BOGUE, District Judge., BEFORE:  LOKEN and BYE, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE, District Judge.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Charles S. Kramer, argued, St. Louis, MO (Norbert Glassl, St. Louis, MO on the brief), for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Thomas E. Wack, argued, St. Louis, MO (Kevin Michael Abel, St. Louis, MO on the brief), for appellee.