United States Eighth Circuit

Evidence that bank employee had conflict of interest when approving loans is alone insufficient to support the conclusion that she displayed a "manifest intent" to injure the bank and warrants fidelity bond coverage.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/16/2001
• Published 08/16/2001

Judges

• WOLLMAN, Chief Judge., Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, MAGILL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Patrick W. Durick, argued, Bismark, ND (Jonathan P. Sanstead, on the brief), for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Joseph A. Nilan, argued, Minneapolis, MN (David H. Gregerson, on the brief), for appellee.