Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


INACOM CORP. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., 99-3085

Choice of law provision designating Illinois law does not govern the choice of law for a fraudulent concealment claim where the balance of factors in the Restate (Second) of Conflict of Laws shows that Nebraska law had the most significant relationship to the tort.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/13/2001
  • Published 06/13/2001

Judges

  • HANSEN, Circuit Judge., Before BOWMAN and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and CARMAN, Judge.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Brigita Benitez, argued, Washington, DC (Joseph K. Meusey, Lon A. Licata, David J. Stubstad, Louis R. Cohen, on the brief), for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • John P. Pasarelli, argued, Omaha, NE (Patrick E. Brookhouser, James M. Sulentic, on the brief), for appellee.
Copied to clipboard