United States Eighth Circuit
HUNT v. MASSANARI, 00-2487
Where a hypothetical question posed to a vocational expert fails to adequately account for claimant's borderline intellectual functioning, the case should be remanded for further proceedings to determine the effect of claimant's condition on her ability to work.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/16/2001
- Published 05/16/2001
Judges
- BRIGHT, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BRIGHT, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- E. Gregory Wallace, argued, Buies Creek, NC (Anthony W. Bartels, briefed, Jonesboro, AR), for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Thomas C. Strafuss, argued, Dallas, TX, for appellee.