Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


HUNT v. MASSANARI, 00-2487

Where a hypothetical question posed to a vocational expert fails to adequately account for claimant's borderline intellectual functioning, the case should be remanded for further proceedings to determine the effect of claimant's condition on her ability to work.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/16/2001
  • Published 05/16/2001

Judges

  • BRIGHT, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BRIGHT, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • E. Gregory Wallace, argued, Buies Creek, NC (Anthony W. Bartels, briefed, Jonesboro, AR), for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Thomas C. Strafuss, argued, Dallas, TX, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard