United States Eighth Circuit

Accident constructionist's testimony was not scientifically valid under Daubert where expert conceded deficiencies at the core of his opinion, including an inability to scientifically reconstruct the accident and a conclusion based on speculation and conjecture.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/13/2001
• Published 03/13/2001

Judges

• HANSEN, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Michael A. Lawder, Belleville, IL, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Dan Howe Ball, St. Louis, MO, for appellee.