United States Eighth Circuit

Administrative Law Judge's resolution of conflicting medical evidence was supported by substantial evidence which showed that claimant's complaints were inconsistent with his work history, daily activities, doctor's testimony, and personal demeanor at the hearing. An ALJ may exclude from hypothetical question to vocational expert any impairment the ALJ has determined is not substantiated.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/21/2001
• Published 02/21/2001

Judges

• BOGUE, District Judge., Before McMILLIAN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE, District Judge.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Timothy J. Cuddigan, argued, Omaha, NE, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Ellyn Grant, Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Omaha, NE, for Appellee.