United States Eighth Circuit

Given sufficiency of evidence to support conspiracy for distribution of methamphetamine, defendant's argument that he thought he was selling onions was "patently absurd," and no independent evidence was required to admit co-conspirator's out-of-court statements.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/08/2000
• Published 12/08/2000

Judges

• HANSEN, Circuit Judge., Before:  HANSEN, HEANEY, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• JoAnne Lilledahl, argued, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Peter E. Deegan, argued, Sioux City, IA, for Appellee.