Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Seventh Circuit


US v. St. Clair, 18-1933

Held that a defendant waived his right to challenge his supervised release conditions, because at his revocation hearing he told the judge he had discussed them with counsel and had no objections or questions. Affirmed the sentence.

Appellate Information

  • Published 2019/06/07

Judges

  • Hamilton

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard