United States Seventh Circuit
Parvati Corp. v. City of Oak Forest, 09-1107
In plaintiff's zoning dispute with a city over a hotel that plaintiff owned but wanted to sell, district court's denial of plaintiff's Rule 60(b) for postjudgment relief and Rule 59(e) motion for reconsideration, are vacated and remanded with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, because plaintiff chose to accept its loss on the administrative review claim, dismissed its claims for damages, and permitted final judgment to be entered on the merits of the zoning challenge, and because now plaintiff no longer owns the property at issue, plaintiff lacks standing to reopen the judgment on that claim.
Appellate Information
- Argued 05/19/2010
- Decided 12/23/2010
- Published 12/23/2010
Judges
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit