United States Seventh Circuit

In a prosecution of defendant for illegal re-entry into the United States, district court's imposition of a 64-month sentence is affirmed as the only potential error defendant identified is the district court's silence with respect to a possible disparity that could arise between defendant's sentence and those available to defendants in other districts, and here, defendant did not adequately develop this argument and the district court was entitled to hand down an otherwise procedurally and substantively sound sentence without discussing the point.

Appellate Information

• Argued 05/19/2010
• Decided 07/29/2010
• Published 07/29/2010

Judges

• FLAUM

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel