United States Seventh Circuit
Bandak v. Eli Lilly & Co. Retirement Plan, 09-1620
Judgment in favor of plaintiff in his ERISA suit against his former employer's retirement plan is affirmed as defendant's rejection of plaintiff's claim was not substantially justified in reducing his benefits under a 1997 amendment after he transferred from the United Kingdom to the US affiliate.
Appellate Information
- Argued 10/09/2009
- Decided 11/18/2009
- Published 11/18/2009
Judges
- POSNER, Circuit Judge., Before POSNER, ROVNER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Andrew W. Hull (argued), Hoover Hull LLP, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Jon B. Laramore (argued), Paul Alan Wolfla, Baker & Daniels, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendants-Appellants.