Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


US v. Strahan, 07-1494

Conviction and sentence for drug crimes is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly declined to give defendant's requested jury instruction on a public authority defense as the evidence was insufficient to support the defense; 2) the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction; and 3) defendant's mandatory-minimum sentence based on judge-found facts regarding prior felony drug convictions did not violate the Sixth Amendment, and and a life term based on recidivism does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 04/15/2008
  • Decided 05/15/2009
  • Published 05/15/2009

Judges

  • SYKES, Circuit Judge., Before CUDAHY, KANNE, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • James E. Crowe, III, Attorney (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Fairview Heights, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Steven V. Stenger, Attorney (argued), Klar, Izsak & Stenger, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard