United States Seventh Circuit
Huusko v. Endicott, 07-2660
In a collateral attack on a conviction alleging that the defendant's appellate attorney furnished ineffective assistance of counsel by not calling a witness whom the attorney had represented in another matter, judgment against defendant is affirmed where, under the Wisconsin ethical rules, lawyers must maintain a former client's confidences but do not have a duty to protect a former client's current legal interests, thus there was no conflict of interest.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/18/2009
- Published 02/18/2009
Judges
- EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge., Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and POSNER and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Steven J. Winger, argued, Winston & Strawn, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Katherine L. Tripp, Katherine D. Lloyd, argued, Office of the Attorney General, Madison, WI, for Respondent-Appellee.