Teague v. Mayo, 07-1155
In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action, judgment against Plaintiff is affirmed where the District Court's delay in screening Plaintiff prisoner's complaint under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(A) was not prejudicial.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/03/2008
- Decided 01/27/2009
- Published 01/27/2009
Judges
- EVANS, Circuit Judge., Before KANNE, EVANS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Jesse M. Krannich (argued), Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Paul Berks (argued), Office of the Attorney General, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.