United States Seventh Circuit
US v. Hagerman, 07-3874
Conviction for making materially false statements in reports that defendant was required to file under the Clean Water Act is affirmed where: 1) evidence of uncharged offenses could not be feasibly separated out from evidence for the charged offenses; 2) the judge's language in a jury instruction was a correct interpretation of a permit, and the meaning of the permit presented an issue of law that the judge was entitled to determine; and 3) the judge did not abuse his discretion in imposing a prison sentence on defendant.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/15/2009
- Published 01/15/2009
Judges
- POSNER, Circuit Judge., Before: POSNER, ROVNER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Steven D. DeBrota (submitted), Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Steven L. Blakely (submitted), Acton & Snyder, Danville, IL, for Defendants-Appellants.