United States Seventh Circuit
Pearle Vision, Inc. v. Romm, 07-2681
In a suit over violations of a franchise agreement, judgment of contempt for failure to comply with a preliminary injunction to make available to plaintiff certain items, including patient files, is affirmed where: 1) defendant was given an opportunity to purge the contempt through compliance; 2) defendant waived his arguments that the sanction was excessive and unrelated to plaintiff's damages; and 3) defendant was given sufficient leniency as a pro se litigant.
Appellate Information
- Argued 01/23/2008
- Decided 09/03/2008
- Published 09/03/2008
Judges
- MANION, Circuit Judge., Before MANION, ROVNER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Michael J. Wall (argued), Rothschild, Barry & Myers, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., John O. Noland, Jr. (argued), Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellants.