Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


US v. Rice, 06-3190

Conviction and sentence on drug and weapons charges are affirmed where: 1) jury instructions that correctly stated the disjunctive requirements of the interstate commerce requirement of the felony-in-possession statute corrected a misstatement in the indictment which listed the requirements as conjunctive; 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to sever a felon-in-possession charge; 3) there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction; 4) the district court correctly calculated defendant's base offense level; 5) the court correctly determined that a previous state felony was a crime of violence for purposes of a career offender enhancement; and 6) defendant's sentence was reasonable.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/01/2008
  • Published 04/01/2008

Judges

  • WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge., Before CUDAHY, POSNER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Matthew Getter (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Douglas J. Rathe (argued), Wilmette, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard