US v. Moore, 06-1355
Conviction for possession of heroin with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the testimony of an expert witness since neither side requested or assisted in a Rule 702 analysis; and 2) the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction. Two other appeals are dismissed as frivolous.
- Argued 03/05/2008
- Decided 03/27/2008
- Published 03/27/2008
- EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge., Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and MANION and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
- United States Seventh Circuit
- For Appellant:
- Folashade Moore, Danbury, CT, pro se.
- For Appellees:
- Stuart D. Fullerton, Debra Riggs Bonamici (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Timothy R. Roellig, Novelle & Roellig, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant, Folashade Moore., Gregory T. Mitchell (argued), Homewood, IL, for Defendant-Appellant, Taofiq Afonja., Shaundra L. Kellam, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Springfield, IL, Richard H. Parsons, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, Michael R. Sanders, Federal Correctional Institution, Big Spring, TX, for Defendant-Appellant, Michael R. Sanders.