Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


US v. Silvious, 05-4576

Conviction and sentence for wire fraud are affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) the district court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas based on actual innocence; 2) an ordered forfeiture was invalid because it was ordered under statutes other than those listed in the indictment; 3) he was given insufficient notice of the planned forfeiture; 4) the district court erroneously refused to grant him a reduction in his offense level for acceptance of responsibility; 5) the district court erred in imposing various special conditions of supervised release; 6) the district court erred in its description of the monetary penalties in the written order; and 7) the district court-s fact-finding regarding the amount of loss caused by his fraud violated the Sixth Amendment.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/04/2008
  • Published 01/04/2008

Judges

  • SYKES, Circuit Judge., Before KANNE, ROVNER, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Owen F. Silvious, Glenville, WV, pro se.

  • For Appellees:
  • Michelle L. Jacobs (submitted), Timothy W. Funnell, Office of the United States Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard