United States Seventh Circuit

Convictions and sentences for drug-distribution are affirmed over defendants' arguments that: 1) the evidence to support one of the convictions was insufficient; 2) one of the sentences was unreasonable; 3) the district court erred in its refusal to compel production of an informant's tax records and its admission of testimony concerning both the informant's trespassing arrest and his presence in the car during a defendant's drug purchases; and 4) the evidence linking one defendant to the overall conspiracy was insufficient.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/18/2007
• Published 12/18/2007

Judges

• FLAUM, Circuit Judge., Before FLAUM, RIPPLE, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• K. Tate Chambers, Office of the United States Attorney, Peoria, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Spencer L. Daniels, Maribeth Egert Dura, Dura Law Office, Peoria, IL, Jeremy S. Karlin, Stoerzbach Morrison, Galesburg, IL, for Defendants-Appellants.