United States Seventh Circuit
US v. Millet, 06-2678
Conviction and sentence for drug distribution are affirmed in part where: 1) defendant failed to demonstrate a lack of predisposition to commit the charged crimes, so he was not entitled to an entrapment instruction; 2) the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction; 3) defendant was a leader of a conspiracy having five or more participants so he was not eligible for safety-valve relief; 4) a role enhancement was proper; and 5) the court gave an adequate statement of reasons for its within-Guidelines sentence. The sentence is remanded where the district court did not make an independent factual determination as to the amount of drugs defendant conspired to steal.
Appellate Information
- Argued 05/22/2007
- Decided 12/14/2007
- Published 12/14/2007
Judges
- WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge., Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and WILLIAMS and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Benjamin F. Langner (argued), Office Of The United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Sarah O'Rourke Schrup (argued), Matthew Ford, David Rontal, Northwestern University School of Law, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.