United States Seventh Circuit

Conviction for attempted enticement and travel for the purpose of engaging in a sexual act with a minor is affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) the enticement statute was facially unconstitutional because it did not contain a scienter requirement; and 2) the court erred in instructing the jury about the intent element of the attempted enticement charge.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/09/2007
• Published 10/09/2007

Judges

• RIPPLE, Circuit Judge., Before POSNER, RIPPLE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Lindsay Jenkins (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Bret A. Rappaport, Arika J. Osacky (argued), Schwartz, Cooper, Greenberger & Krauss, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.